HTTP 429 "Too Many Requests" means the API is rate-limiting your client because it has received more requests than allowed in a given window. To resolve and prevent it, follow these diagnostic and mitigation steps.

Immediate checks - Inspect the API response headers for Retry-After (or X-RateLimit-* headers) to see how long to wait before retrying. - Confirm which endpoint triggered the limit and whether limits differ by endpoint or method. - Check your provider dashboard for rate-limit and quota details and recent usage spikes.

HTTP 429 "Too Many Requests" means the API is rate-limiting your client because it has received more requests than allowed in a given window. To resolve and prevent it, follow these diagnostic and mitigation steps.

Rate-limit handling strategies

  • Respect Retry-After: if present, delay retries for the specified time.

  • Implement exponential backoff with jitter to avoid synchronized retries across clients.

  • Limit concurrency: reduce parallel requests from threads/processes or add a request queue.

  • Batch requests where possible or use bulk endpoints to reduce call volume.

  • Cache responses for repeated requests to avoid unnecessary API calls.

  • Debounce frequent client actions (e.g., typing-triggered requests) and aggregate them server-side.

  • Add server-side throttling to prevent client bursts from exhausting quota.

Common causes to investigate

  • Background jobs or cron tasks sending bursts of requests.

  • Multiple services or deployments sharing the same API key.

  • Endless retry loops where retries are immediate and unbounded.

  • Missing or incorrect use of pagination causing repeated full-data fetches.

  • Webhook re-delivery storms or misconfigured clients.

Example exponential backoff (pseudocode)

  • Use sleep = base * 2^attempt + random_jitter, cap at max_delay, and stop after max_attempts.

JavaScript example:

const maxAttempts = 6;

const baseDelay = 500; // ms

async function requestWithBackoff(fn) {

for (let attempt = 0; attempt < maxAttempts; attempt++) {

try {

  return await fn();

} catch (err) {

  if (err.status !== 429) throw err;

  const jitter = Math.random() * 100;

  const delay = Math.min(baseDelay * 2 ** attempt + jitter, 10000);

  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, delay));

}

}

throw new Error(‘Max retry attempts reached’);

}

Python example:

import time, random

def request_with_backoff(func):

max_attempts = 6

base = 0.5

for attempt in range(max_attempts):

    try:

        return func()

    except ApiError as e:

        if e.status_code != 429:

            raise

        jitter = random.random() * 0.1

        delay = min(base * (2 ** attempt) + jitter, 10)

        time.sleep(delay)

raise RuntimeError("Max retries reached")

Operational recommendations

  • Add monitoring/alerts for 429s and unusual request spikes.

  • Log request timestamps, endpoints, and API key usage to identify patterns.

  • If appropriate, request a quota increase from the API provider with evidence of legitimate usage patterns.

  • Rotate or segregate API keys per service to isolate noisy clients.

  • Ensure idempotency for operations so retries don’t cause side effects.

If you can share the response headers or a snippet of the request flow (no secrets or full keys), I can suggest targeted changes to reduce 429s.